Champion sheet · ADC

Lucian

Patches 16.19 to 16.21 · EUW

Tournament presence · pick + ban

13.3%#55 of 173 champions

Pick: 8.4%picked in 580 of 6,904 games
Ban: 4.9%169 bans over 3,418 games, against 0.8% in soloQ

Win rate as ADC49.1% between 45.6% and 52.6% over 554 gamesSoloQ 49.1%: no clear gap

Median length29.1 minsoloQ 27.7 min

Amateur: 6,931 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, EUW. SoloQ Master+: 372,957 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.

What changes in tournaments3 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as ADC.DraftLength
How to play itPress the Attack, then Essence Reaver, Navori Flickerblade, and Infinity Edge: the most played build in soloQ.
In a compTeam damage first: more damage than 100% of ADC.DamagePoke
With / againstBetter than expected against Viktor in amateur play: +16.7 pts over 55 games, range above zero.+16.7 pt55 games
In draftFallback pick: comes out late in the series, once the pool has emptied.

01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

3 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as ADC.

DraftPicked more often in amateur play
Amateur
4.0%
SoloQ
3.3%
4.0% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 3.3% in soloQ.
DraftBanned more often in amateur play
Amateur
4.9%
SoloQ
0.8%
4.9% ban rate in amateur play over 2,100 games, against 0.8% in soloQ over 166,064 games.
LengthLonger games in amateur play
Amateur
29.1 min
SoloQ
27.7 min
Median of 29.1 min in amateur play, against 27.7 min in soloQ.

02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Press the Attack, then Essence Reaver, Navori Flickerblade, and Infinity Edge: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block

RunesPress the Attack97% · 24,582

Same in amateur play

SpellsFlash + Barrier72% · 18,243

Same in amateur play

SkillsQnot collected in soloQ

Amateur: 100% · 117 games

Core (3 legendaries)35% · 5,566

35%of soloQ games

Essence Reaver
Navori Flickerblade
Infinity Edge

Same in amateur play

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Team damage first: more damage than 100% of ADC.

Team damagetop1%28% · ADC: 23%

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other ADC

What marks it

Damage
Poke

Like other ADC

Damage in mid game
Damage in late game
Takes its kills in duels
Lets allies carry kills

What it is not

Few teamfights
Little CC

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 96 in lane, 71 in mid game and 72 in late game, out of 100 ADC.

619+95 vs 525

1,002+87 vs 915

1,438+72 vs 1,366

Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30

LucianADC

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, ahead of 89% of ADC against the direct opponent.

ADC

Where it stands among ADC · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100

Damage in lane · rank 96 of 100 among ADC619 · median 525
Damage in mid game · rank 71 of 100 among ADC1,002 · median 915
Damage in late game · rank 72 of 100 among ADC1,438 · median 1,366
Gold at 15 min · rank 95 of 100 among ADC+356 · median -54
Gold at 20 min · rank 89 of 100 among ADC+418 · median -85
Absorbs damage · rank 82 of 100 among ADC465 · median 361
Plays teamfights · rank 13 of 100 among ADC53% · median 56%
Takes its kills in duels · rank 64 of 100 among ADC19% · median 19%
Lets allies carry kills · rank 26 of 100 among ADCrank 26 of 100
Crowd control (CC) · rank 7 of 100 among ADC0.1 · median 0.6
Team damage · rank 100 of 100 among ADC28% · median 23%

04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

Better than expected against Viktor in amateur play: +16.7 pts over 55 games, range above zero.

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected

Gnar63.6% · expected 51.2% · 33 g+12.4 ptSoloQ +1.4

Ornn50.9% · expected 50.6% · 57 g+0.3 ptSoloQ +0.4

Junglegap to expected

Jarvan IV53.7% · expected 49.4% · 54 g+4.3 ptSoloQ +2.9

Midgap to expected

Viktor65.5% · expected 48.8% · 55 g+16.7 ptSoloQ -1.3

Locke53.3% · expected 44.0% · 30 g+9.3 ptSoloQ -0.5

ADCgap to expected

Caitlyn53.8% · expected 47.1% · 39 g+6.7 ptSoloQ +1.2

Ashe51.9% · expected 51.3% · 54 g+0.6 ptSoloQ -5.1

Supportgap to expected

Rakan56.8% · expected 46.7% · 37 g+10.1 ptSoloQ +5.0

Karma58.7% · expected 50.7% · 46 g+8.0 ptSoloQ -0.9

With

Topgap to expected

K'Sante55.6% · expected 47.4% · 36 g+8.2 ptSoloQ -3.8

Junglegap to expected

Wukong50.9% · expected 49.0% · 57 g+1.9 ptSoloQ +0.2

Xin Zhao52.6% · expected 48.7% · 38 g+4.0 ptSoloQ -5.8

Midgap to expected

Syndra57.8% · expected 49.3% · 64 g+8.5 ptSoloQ +0.2

Viktor58.8% · expected 49.4% · 51 g+9.4 ptSoloQ +2.2

Supportgap to expected

Milio50.7% · expected 47.8% · 359 g+2.9 ptSoloQ +0.6

Nami48.1% · expected 46.8% · 54 g+1.3 ptSoloQ -0.1

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by

Top20 champions